\rightarrowfill which you might
> > > be
> > > able to put into a frame of the desired width?
> > >
> > > \starttext
> > > $1\xrightarrow[none]{blah} 1$
> > > \par
> > > $2\xrightarrow[normal]{blah} 2$
> > > \par
> > > $
' and 'big'. You can 'kludge' these by extending the length of the text
using hard spaces. Alternatively there is \rightarrowfill which you might be
able to put into a frame of the desired width?
\starttext
$1\xrightarrow[none]{blah} 1$
\par
$2\xrightarrow[normal]{blah} 2$
\par
$3\xrightarrow[small
You can 'kludge' these by extending the length of the text
> using hard spaces. Alternatively there is \rightarrowfill which you might be
> able to put into a frame of the desired width?
>
> \starttext
> $1\xrightarrow[none]{blah} 1$
> \par
> $2\xrightarrow[normal]{blah} 2$
> \par
>
> On 1 Jan 2021, at 14:25, Johann Birnick wrote:
>
> Hi Aditya,
>
> I know the syntax, my problem is about the options for the length of the
> arrow.
>
> For example
>
> \xrightarrow[big]{abc}
>
> gives a longer arrow than
>
> \xrightarrow{abc
Hi Aditya,
I know the syntax, my problem is about the options for the length of the arrow.
For example
\xrightarrow[big]{abc}
gives a longer arrow than
\xrightarrow{abc}
According to different manuals also specific lengths should be possible. But
they don't work. I think it's a bug. (because
On Thu, 31 Dec 2020, Johann Birnick wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> \starttext
> $\xrightarrow[50pt]$
> \stoptext
>
> doesn't work. But it should, right? In the manual
>
> \starttext
> $\xrightarrow[50]$
> \stoptext
>
> is shown, but that doesn't work ei
Hi there,
\starttext
$\xrightarrow[50pt]$
\stoptext
doesn't work. But it should, right? In the manual
\starttext
$\xrightarrow[50]$
\stoptext
is shown, but that doesn't work either.
Best regards,
Johann
erman
Cc: mailing list for ConTeXt users
Subject: Re: [NTG-context] xrightarrow is not straight
On Tue, 7 Aug 2018 10:42:01 +0200
"Joshua Moerman" wrote:
> Hi ConTeXt mailing list,
>
> I am using the extensible arrows and I am not really satisfied with
> the looks of
On Tue, 7 Aug 2018 13:06:23 -0400 (EDT)
Aditya Mahajan wrote:
> > Furthermore, the MP arrow can be tuned
> >
> > \startMPinitializations
> >
> > ahlength := .5EmWidth ;
> > ahvariant := 1 ; % dimpled straight
> >
> > \stopMPinitializations
> >
> > as can line widths, etc.
>
> Shouldn't we use
On Tue, 7 Aug 2018, Alan Braslau wrote:
Hello,
You can also use MetaPost to render math stackers, rather than relying
on TeX constructs and any particular font.
For example:
\useMPlibrary[mat]
\definemathstackers
[mp]
[alternative=mp]
\definemathextensible [mp] [leftarrow]
On Tue, 7 Aug 2018, Joshua Moerman wrote:
Another thing I noticed is that the line is not very consistent. This might
be a font issue (I am using Euler). Luckily, the inconsistent overlap is
barely visible when printed.
It is a viewer issue. It should also go away if you zoom the pdf.
Aditya
ou can see this in the attached picture: the left arrow is
> using \xrightarrow{\neq a} and the right arrow is using \stackrel{\neq
> a}{\longrightarrow}. I think the right one (with stackrel) looks more
> natural. Is there a way to setup the vertical spacing?
>
> Another thing I n
Hi ConTeXt mailing list,
I am using the extensible arrows and I am not really satisfied with the
looks of it.
The most important issue I have is that the vertical spacing is too much.
You can see this in the attached picture: the left arrow is using
\xrightarrow{\neq a} and the right arrow
Hi,
Some math symbols seem to be failing with the latest nightly build.
Minimal example:
\starttext
\section{blah}
A $a \xRightarrow b$ B.
\stoptext
I see this in the output:
ConTeXt ver: 2012.07.04 23:48 MKIV fmt: 2012.7.6 int: english/english
system tex error on line 3 in file
14 matches
Mail list logo
